|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Mr TamiyaCowboy
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
121
   |
Posted - 2012.08.15 12:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
no offence CCP but EDITED BY GM KIRIAP have you done.
i can now spend more time waiting for a fight , than last build. in last build a 2m timer.
todays build, you wait until you have 12 men. with people seeing a waiting list they just leave servers. making the wait even longer.
WHY ?
i expected something better, all you have done is thrown a bunch of servers in without any thought.
and a life time waiting list. infact the servers are all mixed up and all but a very few have a red circle.
and or a long waiting list.
Pay for COMS, your fricking joking CCP ? does the CSM know about this ?
i want to talk with my eve buddys for free, not have to dual clinet dust and eve with two differnet com sets.
is this Sonys way to make money ? or just a bad mistake on CCPs behalf ? this is dust not fricking british telecom !!
a mildly Angry Dust/Eve player |
Mr TamiyaCowboy
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:01:00 -
[2] - Quote
am sorry but i will not beat around the bush.
as i said its dust not BT,o2,* add your local call provider here*. this upsets me the most i mean COM'ON CCP !!! EVE VOICE IS FREE so why is DUST VOICE not ? explain this ?
player matching just killed the mass fights, i went to a second server this time 13 people in game,
now you would expect a 6 v 7 side in play. OH NO , there standing in the war room with a message waiting for 6/12
those 12 people have to be 12 on each side, meh am now in two thoughts to say stuff this n thanks ccp.
i just want to do what i was doing shoot shizzle without all the bullfest added.
yeah its beta but im being blunt and to the point, the eve players will not be so nice and nodoubt jita will burn as like other hubs.
do something else,
cut the lawn, feed the dog, get the kids ready, visit the ducks,
4hrs later, in dust local
Tamiyacowboy : WTF i been in this war room for 4hrs waiting and we only have 4/12 ( 9 players showing ingame),
BBL gonna service the wife with chocolate to stop the eve griefing shout on coms if games comes up. |
Mr TamiyaCowboy
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iceyburnz wrote:The new system definitely seems clunkier and less intuitive than before.
Hopefully CCP streamlines it again somehow.
yeah i asked my godson ( yes he plays to and is kind o young) said nearly the same words.
he was flabberghasted at the server choice was left scratching his head, he asked me and i could not explain to him.
then i told him there could be about 4,000 showing. he looked at me as if i was stupid. that look that says " i dont like this game any more".
he loved the last build said it was simple and easy to navigate, this is a 12yr old kid ccp not an irate 40yr adult.
there servers are all over the place , you should be able to select by choice, either ambush corp or skirmish under tabs using the L1 - R1 buttons, under these sub tabs you find the servers. not a free for all pick and mix. and infact what this small 12yr lad has said is a good idea for one. a ambush tab , a skirmish tab, a corp battle tab. SIMPLES ?
no offence but it is bad CCP not your fault exactly and some ours , we give feedback and you use it.
but the servers are borked, something is not right , 6v7 should be a viable match opening and running. more would join.
but the 12 man side thing has got to go, and/or be refined. good idea badly implemented. ( throwing an idea here)
maybe the 12 man entry could be used in corp battle area. you must have a 12 man minimum squad, but the ambush and skirmish have a 6 man each side minimum cap. again simple but could be more effective.
the servers need to say if they are waiting for players or the game IS PLAYING, started means the game has started, it should not mean your waiting around doing nothing for god knows how long. |
Mr TamiyaCowboy
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 15:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
the battle matching, played one game, will not use it again. just chucked me into those pointless ambush games.
expected not to be thrown into a deathmatch but a decent capture points game, i was wrong.
will wait for skirmish games servers, cant be doing with those boring runaround rambo types. |
Mr TamiyaCowboy
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 15:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Steve Renuken wrote:I suspect most people are using Instant battle.
gets you into a fight quickly. Yeah but it gets you into ambush (which no one wants to play right now)
yup 100% so true.
ambush:
i hate it, very pointless thing, you run around shoot dudes, run around more shoot dudes, die and shoot dudes.
its a rinse and repeat affair. has no meaning or end. have always hated them deathmatch type games highly boring same rubbish no goal.
atleast with skirmish there is a goal ( somewhat) shove the ambush maps into the skirmish maps. no deathmatch but open and enclosed urban combat with a purpose.
without the skirmish maps, it is kind of pointless me playing beta, thats like trying to force a miner into pvp, it aint gonna happen |
Mr TamiyaCowboy
Condotta Rouvenor
Gallente Federation
121
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
Just got two skirmish on the trot, i think its a lucky dip until they sort out the server UI layout.
some nice words.
graphics are getting better, but the hacking graphics look a little bugged, just looks a little unclean to me.
terrain mapping is wicked, i do like but some parts still do not flow. its good but work could be had on the upper sections.
more defined paths to the top ledges and trails.
London smog, its looking ok but to strong in areas, in open field battles the smog is like a misted up set of ski goggles.
sniping is a very hit and miss,
auto target is lacking somewhere i cannot explain but its worse than last build. last build was lovely it kind of settled down and took a matter a couple games. this auto aim is like a eve fanfest dude out with the devs on a pub crawl ( puts the HYPER, in hyperactive) needs toning down to last build.
larger maps should auto generate a stamina boost, short from calling in a hav/lav/ds its a long old run to the front line.
scouts have no problem, just assaults. short lived boost to get you front line only.
COM's
CCP please put us to rest about the coms. two matches nobody bar me and another guy on. we need openness about coms and how this pay 2 talk works. i for one do not want to see gaming headlines like " you can chat with eve but it costs you " by well known gaming site/s.
Could we have a thread opened about the coms for aurum so we can express our feelings and you CCP can help us and you work something out. if it means some kind of plex system etc fine, or a choice of a F2P or a semi F2p where a small charge of like a fiver ( english currency) a month gave full voice and other perks. customization , group merc quarters gathering etc etc. as i see it this needs to be discussed a lot more to put us the players at rest and so we understand how it will work why and if possible any other ways to have coms free
other wise sorry for the bashing and straight up thoughts, keep it up and stay in contact with us the gamers. be open with us and we shall be open with you. |
|
|
| |
|